Good Afternoon Everyone:
Last night our school board met again to address the worst budget crisis of our time. They approved a $2.9 million package of budget cuts, and are scheduled to meet weekly throughout the month of June to consider up to $8 million more in cuts by month’s end.
These are the highlights of the reductions approved last night:
- Reassign teachers facing layoffs into a pool of longterm substitute teachers, savings to be determined – potentially up to $1 million
- Increase class sizes in grades 2 and 3 to 30 students to 1 teacher, $750,000
- Close under-enrolled Regional Occupational Program (ROP) classes, $232,000
- Increase student meal prices by 50 cents and open new points of sale at Natomas High’s Terrace Cafe to generate more sales, $230,000
- Cut 2.5 positions for secondary social studies, $145,000
- Make further reductions in the support staff at the Education Center, $166,000
- Increase the distance students walk before busing is provided, $100,000
- Eliminate an unfilled elementary vice principal position, $96,000
- Reduce use of the Tungsten program, $45,000
- Cancel elementary summer school but keep high school summer school (middle school summer school will be addressed next week), $28,000
- Implement further energy savings including keeping the swimming pool at Natomas High open only June-September and turning off the stadium lights at Natomas High and Inderkum High in the evenings, $24,500
- Trim staff development budget for certificated staff, $21,516
- Reduce the contribution to the Natomas Schools Foundation, $16,000
- Reduce school decentralized supply budgets by 10 percent, $70,000
As you may know, the state budget crisis is worsening by the day and school districts across the state are having their state income reduced even more drastically than anticipated just weeks ago.
To put this in some context – during the Great Depression, budgets for education were cut by 25 percent over a five-year period. In California, we are facing a 25 percent reduction in state funding over just two years, according to some estimates.
Below are some of the possible budget cuts that may be under consideration at the June 11 special meeting of the Board of Trustees:
- Closing schools, $300,000 to $400,000
- Temporarily closing Bannon Creek Elementary for construction safety concerns during the conversion of the campus from a K-5 to a K-8 school (this construction project is using bond dollars that cannot be used for other expenses such as staff salaries and student supplies), $250,000
- Authorizing targeted layoffs, variable savings
- Eliminating athletics, $357,425
- Putting more/all schools on multi-track year-round schedules with a school closure, $400,000
- Having a four-day school week, $250,000
- More energy savings that include letting our lawns go brown, $40,000 or more
- Not purchasing school workbooks, $300,000
- Eliminating all bus transportation except for special education students (a mandated service), $862,000
- Eliminating all Tier III categorical programs, $1.4 million
- Staff furloughs, variable savings
- Eliminating P.E. for high school juniors and seniors and only offering the class at the freshman/sophomore level, $232,000
- Further review of increasing class sizes at the K-1 level (the Board already approved increasing class sizes at every grade level by 1), savings to be determined
Still to be addressed are issues of employee compensation that are subject to negotiations. Please note the following potential savings:
- Freeze step-and-column increases, $1.68 million or the equivalent of 29 teaching positions
- Implement furlough days, $283,363 per each furlough day or the equivalent of 5 teaching positions
- 3 percent salary reduction for all employees and administrators, $1.644 million or the equivalent of 28 teaching positions
- Eliminate compensation for class size overages, $236,000 or the equivalent of 4 teaching positions
In a related matter, our district is working to resolve the issue of School Resource Officers at Inderkum High and Natomas High. I’d like to note that we are in discussions with other agencies to provide this service at a lower cost than our contract with the Sacramento Police Department which ends June 30.
I’d also like to provide clarification on another important issue: How we pay for one-time land purchases/school construction vs. how we pay for ongoing expenses like salaries and school supplies:
- The funds for land purchases/school construction come from separate money “pots,” if you will, and can’t be comingled with funds for salaries and school supplies.
- We have built our new schools, modernized our campuses and purchased the West Lakeside property for future school use with voter-approved school bond money and land developer fees, among other sources dedicated just for this use.
-We pay for our salaries, school supplies and all other ongoing educational expenses out of the general fund – typically money that comes from state and federal sources.
As I said in yesterday’s message, I wish there was better news to report on the state budget crisis and how it’s affecting school districts across the state. I look forward to the day when education once again is made the top financial priority that it deserves to be in California.
Thursday, June 4, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I suggest that you don't just spread Dr. Farrar's message without commentary and an NTA response. Otherwise, you are just repeating the District's propaganda, and we are already getting more than we need.
By the way, when is the NTA going to take a stand on all the grand jury findings?
I appreciate all that the union is doing, but I think it would be a good idea to make sure that a survey of members regarding what cuts they are willing to live with goes out. I am concerned that the upcoming general membership meeting may end up being a "who's better on open mic night" situation rather than offering leadership/the Negotiation team a clear picture of what the will of the majority is. I think a survey with a slate of options or a priorities ranking would be the way to go.
Appreciate the comment.
We discussed this at rep council last week, and felt a survey was not feasible at this point (this could change later.) We will have an organized list of the items that pertain to the district proposal to NTA. We will discuss negotiable items for the majority of the meeting, and the non-negotiables at the end - and we will be strict for the sake of time. We will have a recorder to list who wants to speak. Realizing that things have heated up and that our turnout could be larger than usual, we are preparing for it and promise to be as organized and inclusive as we can be. Thankfully, our negotiators have had lots of experience with these meetings.
If they are going to freeze step and column,, they can wait until the year after to do that. I put in my time and earned enough units to move over. They can't just change the rules in the middle of the game. They can wait until the year after so that we have fair notice.
Post a Comment